The WP Alternative Project

Over the last couple of weeks, WordPress has been embroiled in several controversies, primarily revolving around its co-founder Matt Mullenweg and the company's actions towards WP Engine, a major WordPress hosting provider. Here's a summary based on the information available up to October 13, 2024:

1. Trademark and Licensing Dispute: WordPress.org, under the leadership of Matt Mullenweg, accused WP Engine of misusing the WordPress and WooCommerce trademarks, leading to confusion in the marketplace. This resulted in WordPress.org blocking websites hosted by WP Engine from accessing its servers, including crucial security updates and plugins. This action was purportedly taken due to WP Engine's refusal to obtain a trademark license or to change how they presented themselves in relation to WordPress.

2. WP Engine's Reaction: In response, WP Engine not only defended its use of the WordPress name as being within the bounds of open-source etiquette but also highlighted Mullenweg's aggressive tactics. They mentioned receiving demands for a significant percentage of their revenue for trademark licensing, which they viewed as extortion. WP Engine also pointed out Mullenweg's attempts to sway public opinion against them, including through speeches at WordCamp US 2024, which criticized WP Engine's contributions to the WordPress community and their ties to private equity.

3. Community Backlash and Legal Actions: The situation has led to a community divide, with long-time contributors and users expressing dismay over what they see as an attack on the open-source ethos. WP Engine has initiated legal actions against Mullenweg, highlighting his communications where he seemed to prepare for a public relations battle against them. This has led to discussions about the sustainability and ethics of open-source monetization, with some viewing this conflict as threatening to the open-source model.

4. Matt Mullenweg's Public Statements: Mullenweg has publicly criticized WP Engine, comparing it to a "cancer" within the WordPress community, primarily due to their business practices and what he perceives as insufficient contributions back to the open-source project. This stance has been controversial, leading to debates over the ethics of how open-source projects should be managed and monetized.

5. Implications for the WordPress Community: This drama has raised concerns about the future governance of WordPress, the impact on its open-source community, and how disputes like these could affect the platform's stability and user trust. There's a growing discussion on whether WordPress, under its current leadership, can maintain its promise of being a platform for the century.

The situation highlights deeper issues within the tech community regarding the commercialization of open-source software, trademark rights, and community governance. The ongoing legal and public relations battle is not just about WP Engine versus WordPress but touches on fundamental questions about open-source ethics, intellectual property, and community expectations from tech leaders.

ChatGPT on the subject of Exploring Standards and Specifications for Content Management Interoperability. This should serve to seed the discussion or design of a solid standard to build from moving foward.

There are specifications and frameworks in the content management space that are similar to the Open Container Initiative (OCI) specifications for containers. Here are a few notable examples:

1. Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS):

   • CMIS is an OASIS standard that defines a set of services for interacting with content management systems. It provides a common interface for accessing and managing content across different systems, allowing applications to interact with multiple content repositories in a consistent way.

2. Web Content Management (WCM) Standards:

   • Various standards exist for web content management, such as the W3C's Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), which ensure that web content is accessible to all users, including those with disabilities. While not a direct analog to OCI, they set standards for content quality and accessibility.

3. API Standards:

   • Many modern content management systems (CMS) expose their functionalities through APIs, often following REST or GraphQL conventions. For instance, the JSON:API specification provides a standardized format for building APIs in a consistent way, which can be beneficial for integrating various CMS solutions.

4. Schema.org:

   • While not a specification for content management systems per se, Schema.org provides a vocabulary for structured data on the web, which can help in organizing and managing content across platforms in a machine-readable format.

5. Content Management System Interoperability:

   • Various industry groups and consortiums work towards creating interoperability standards for CMS. For instance, Kaltura and Adobe have been involved in creating specifications for video content management that promote interoperability across platforms.

6. The Content Management API (CMA):

   • Some platforms, like Contentful, have their own CMA that allows for managing and delivering content programmatically, promoting a standardized way to interact with content regardless of the underlying infrastructure.

While these specifications may not be as universally recognized as OCI for containers, they serve similar purposes by promoting interoperability, standardization, and better management of content across different systems.

Back when I first looked at WordPress, in the world of PHP, there were almost no real options. Now we have many, but sadly the ecosystem of plugins and themes seems to only really exist with only a few dominant players. Hate is a strong word, I probably should not be using it here.

If we can re-imagine how the content management and should work, I believe that people can mix and match the core backend and frontend management interface. If one vendor goes nuts, people should be able to nearly effortlessly swap them out.

A Code of Conduct section is essential for setting expectations and ensuring respectful, productive interactions on your forum.

---

Code of Conduct

1. Be Respectful

• Treat everyone with respect and kindness. Personal attacks, harassment, trolling, and inflammatory comments are not tolerated.
• Disagreeing is fine, but do so politely. Focus on ideas, not individuals.

2. Constructive Criticism

• Offer helpful and constructive feedback. When critiquing ideas, provide suggestions for improvement or alternatives in a respectful manner.
• Avoid destructive or negative criticism that doesn't contribute to a solution.

3. No Hate Speech or Discrimination

• This community welcomes individuals of all backgrounds. Any form of hate speech, discrimination, or intolerance based on race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, or nationality is strictly prohibited.

4. Stay On-Topic

• Ensure discussions remain relevant to the thread and forum categories. Off-topic or spammy content should be avoided and will be removed.
• Use the proper channels (e.g., off-topic sections or private messages) for unrelated discussions.

5. No Plagiarism or Copyright Violations

• Share your own work or ensure proper credit and permission when sharing third-party content.
• Refrain from posting or sharing content that violates copyrights or intellectual property laws.

6. Respect Privacy

• Do not share private information about yourself or others. This includes email addresses, physical addresses, phone numbers, and any other sensitive personal data.
• If you require help that involves personal information, use private channels and get explicit consent.

7. No Spam or Self-Promotion

• Unsolicited advertisements, excessive self-promotion, or spamming will not be tolerated.
• Promotion of your work (plugins, themes, projects) is allowed in designated sections (e.g., Community Marketplace) and must follow the guidelines.

8. Focus on Open Source Values

• Support and respect the principles of open source, collaboration, and knowledge-sharing. Foster an inclusive and helpful community.

9. Report Inappropriate Behavior

• If you witness or experience violations of this Code of Conduct, report the behavior to the forum moderators.
• Moderators will review reports and take appropriate action, which may include warnings, temporary suspensions, or bans.

10. Follow the Law

• All users must comply with local, national, and international laws while participating in the forum. Illegal activities, including piracy, hacking, or incitement of violence, will not be tolerated and may result in legal consequences.

---

Enforcement:
Moderators will actively enforce this Code of Conduct. Violations may result in warnings, temporary suspensions, or permanent bans from the community, depending on the severity of the behavior.

Amendments:
This Code of Conduct may be updated periodically to adapt to the community's evolving needs. Any changes will be announced in the Announcements section.